Photo Booth Culture Around the World

The photo booth was invented once, in New York in 1925, and then adopted almost everywhere. What is interesting is how differently each place decided to use it.

In Britain and France it became bureaucratic infrastructure - the machine you visited to obtain a passport photograph. In Japan it became an elaborate social ritual with its own vocabulary, etiquette and sticker-trading economy. In South Korea it became a physical destination and a first-date activity. In America it became largely nostalgic, a fixture of weddings and bars trading on the memory of arcades.

Same machine, four completely different cultural objects. Here is how that happened, and what it suggests about why the format keeps returning.

Japan: purikura and the sticker economy

The most complete reinvention of the format happened in Japan in 1995, when Sasaki Miho - then working at Atlus - developed Print Club, released with Sega. It was shortened almost immediately in common usage to purikura.

The machine kept the booth's essential shape and added everything else: decorative frames, backgrounds, digital pens for drawing on the image, stamps, text. The output was a sheet of small adhesive stickers rather than a single strip.

That last detail is what changed the social meaning entirely. A strip is an object you keep. A sheet of stickers is an object you distribute. Purikura sheets were split among everyone present and stuck into dedicated albums, on phones, on school folders - which turned the machine into a system for producing and exchanging tokens of friendship.

• It became a group activity by design. Booths are large, built for four to six people, and the decoration stage afterwards takes as long as the photography.
• Retouching became automatic and extensive. Enlarged eyes, smoothed skin, lightened tone. This is genuinely contentious and has been criticised at length, but it is central to how the machines developed.
• Many arcades restrict entry to women and mixed groups. A policy introduced in response to harassment, and one that shaped who the spaces belong to.

South Korea: the self-photo studio

South Korea took a different direction, and the result is the most influential version of the format in the 2020s.

Rather than an arcade machine, Korean chains built dedicated self-photo studios: small unstaffed shops containing several private rooms, each with a professional camera, studio lighting, a remote shutter, adjustable backdrops and a mirror. You book or walk in, you have the room to yourself for a fixed period, and you produce the photographs entirely unsupervised.

The distinguishing features are worth noting because they explain the appeal:

• Proper lighting. The results look genuinely professional because they are lit like professional portraits, which is the single biggest difference from an arcade machine.
• Time and privacy. You are not holding up a queue. You can take dozens of frames and choose.
• Minimal aesthetic. Where purikura decorates heavily, the Korean style is restrained - clean backgrounds, monochrome options, simple borders.
• It is a destination. Going to one is a plan in itself, commonly a first-date activity, rather than something you do while passing through a station.

The visual language of these studios - clean, minimal, frequently black and white - has become the reference point for what a good photo strip looks like internationally. It is a substantial part of why the format resurged when it did, and why monochrome is so strongly associated with it, as covered in why black and white photo strips look so good.

Britain and France: the bureaucratic booth

In much of Europe the booth went in the opposite direction and became an instrument of the state.

From the 1960s, booths in railway stations, post offices and town halls existed primarily to produce passport and identity card photographs to official specification: neutral expression, plain background, prescribed head size, no smiling. Photo-Me, founded in Britain in 1962, built a substantial international business on precisely this.

The cultural consequence is specific and slightly melancholy. For a couple of generations of British and French people, the photo booth is associated with administration rather than with fun. The instruction not to smile is doing a lot of work there - a machine that explicitly forbids expression is a different object from one that invites it.

There is a countercurrent worth mentioning. Because the booths were everywhere and cheap, people used them unofficially too, and European photographers and artists produced a considerable body of work with them. The machine's deadpan neutrality, imposed for bureaucratic reasons, turned out to be artistically useful.

The United States: nostalgia as the product

In America the booth followed the arcade. It arrived with the amusement parks and department stores of the 1930s, peaked in the mid-century, and declined alongside the physical spaces that housed it.

What survived is a memory of it. From the 2000s the booth returned largely as an event rental - a fixture at weddings, corporate parties and bars - explicitly trading on nostalgia for a machine most guests never actually used. The vintage curtain, the retro typeface on the footer, the deliberately old-fashioned styling are all signalling an era rather than continuing one.

This is not a criticism; it works, and it works well. But it is a distinct relationship to the object. Purikura and Korean self-photo studios are living formats with contemporary users. The American event booth is mostly a reference to something that ended, which is why it is styled the way it is - and why the wedding booth has developed its own conventions, covered in wedding photo booth ideas.

What travels and what does not

Across all four traditions, a few things are constant and clearly essential to the format.

• A fixed, small number of frames. Never unlimited. The constraint is universal.
• A countdown outside your control. Every version has one, and none of them let you extend it.
• Privacy from onlookers. A curtain, a room, a booth. Nobody has removed this.
• A physical output. Strip, sticker sheet or print - something to take away.
• A group orientation. All four traditions are primarily social rather than solitary.

And a few things vary enormously:

• Decoration. Japanese maximalism versus Korean minimalism, at opposite ends of the same axis.
• Retouching. Automatic and heavy in some traditions, absent in others.
• Whether it is a destination or an incident. A planned outing in Seoul; something you do while waiting for a train in Paris.
• Who it is for. Teenagers, couples, wedding guests, passport applicants.

The current convergence

Something interesting is happening now, which is that these traditions have started to merge.

Korean-style self-photo studios have opened across Europe and North America. Japanese purikura machines appear in Western arcades. Western event booths have adopted the minimal Korean aesthetic in place of the retro-vintage styling. And browser-based booths make the format available in places with no machine at all.

The shared reference point is now the Korean minimal style rather than the American vintage one. A strip taken in 2026 is far more likely to be clean, monochrome and unadorned than to be styled after a 1950s arcade - which is a reversal of where the revival started.

What that convergence suggests is that the format is genuinely durable rather than merely fashionable. Four traditions, developing largely independently on three continents over thirty years, kept the same constraints and varied only the decoration. The constraints are the thing.

Why the same machine keeps meaning something

A photo booth is a small, private space that gives you a fixed number of chances and then hands you an object. That description holds in Tokyo, Seoul, Paris and Chicago, and it has held for a hundred years.

What each culture added on top - stickers, studio lighting, bureaucratic neutrality, retro nostalgia - reflects what that place wanted photographs to do. But nobody has removed the constraints, and every attempt to replace the format with something more capable has failed to displace it.

That is a reasonably strong argument that the limitations are the point rather than an artefact of 1925 engineering. The full version of that argument is in the history of the photo booth.

The browser version is the newest branch and the least culturally specific: no machine, no location, and it works between two countries at once. The LensBooth booth keeps the constraints and drops the geography.

Frequently Asked Questions